|
a.
|
Note: Descendants of Pumel Rathbone Generafion No. I 1. PURNEL2 RATHBONE (JOHN) was born Abt. 1788 in VA, and died Aft. 1860 in Haywood County, NC. He rnarried (1) NAME UNKNOVM Abt. 1801 - He neared (2) MARY PESTAL I 8 Sep 181 8 in Haywood County, NO.She was born Abt. 1803 in VA, and died Aft- 1860 in Haywood County, NC. Notes fidr PURNEL RATHBONE: Census data: >1810 Buncombe Co NC Males 1 (16-26) Females 1 (16-26) 2 (0-9) I (0-9) >1820 Haywood Co NC Males 1 (2645) Females I (lr-,.-26) 2(10-16) 1 (C-9) 3 (0-9) >1 &30 Haywood Go NC Males 1 (MSO) Females 1 (3040) 1 (40-50) 1 (20-30) 1 (15-20) I (10-15) 1 (5-10) 2 (0-5) 1 (20-30) 2 (15-20) 1 (5-1 0) 1 (0-5) Page 2 of 21 > 1 840 Haywood Co NC Males 1 (5MO) Females 1 (50-60) 2 (15-20)1 (10-15) 2 (5-10) 1 (20-30) 1 (15-2()) I (I c@-I 5) >1 850 Haywood Co NC, HH #215 Rathbone, Purnel - 60, rn, Farmer, b. NC ., M. - 44, f, b. VA ............. I M.A. - 23, f, b. NC ...... J. - 21, m, b. NC ........... I P. - 19, m, b. NC................ M.M. - 13, m, b. NC ...... M. - 15, f, b. NC >1 WO Haywood Co NC, Jones Creek PO, HH #332 Rathbon, Pumal - 75, m, Retired, RE $300, PE $2W, b. VA I Polly - 60, f, Donvmbc, b. VA William Rathbone e"e 1887 State of NC Haywood Co Inthe Superior Court [ Wm Rathbone info] In the matter of the administration of the estate William Rathbone Dee'd P Rathbone being sworn, doth say: That William Rathbone late of said county, is dead, without leavmg any Will and Testament, and thatWC Hill is the proper person entitled to Letters of Administration on the Estate of the said William Rathbone by means of the annexed request of the heirs. Further, that the value of said Estate, so far as can be ascertained at the date of thisapplication, is about $3200.00 of which $1 000 is real property and $2200 is personal property and that Pemat Rathbone, Jesse Rathbone, Daniel Rathbone, Jaceple Rathbone, J.M. Rathbone, Susan Williamson, Aveline Rathbone, and the heirs of WesleyRathbone names unknown and heirs of Patsey Beasley names unknown are entitled as heirs and distributes thereof Sworn and subscribed before me, this 19'h day of April 1887. P. Rathbone (his signature) Crabtree April 15 1887 We theBrothers and Sisters of the late William Rathbone deceased are anxious and willing for WC Hill to administer on the estate of our brother William Rathbone deceased. Let Charlie Fish have what money is coming to me; now in your hands as my part ofthe William Rathbone estate: Sept 9,1893 Ebb Fish Witness W H(?) Jarrett State of NC Haywood Co. Received of JK Boone, Clerk Superior Court; the sum of $6.25 in full of principal and interest of what money is due Elbert Fisharising from the sale of lands of the estate of William Rathbone, dead for partition among his heir at law. The said Elbert Fish being a son of Elizabeth Fish dec'd who was a daughter of Crayton Rathbone dead who was a son of Wesley Rathbonedee'd, who was a brother of the said William Rathbone. The said Elbert Tish being 21 years of age. This the I 1"' day of Sep 1893. Witness: S.A- Williamson (her signature) State of NC Haywood Co. To JK Boone, Clerk of the Superior Court of HaywoodCo You are hereby authorized and directed to pay to George W. Williamson of said couty and state and and all money in your office that is due me from the estate of my brother William Rathbone, deceased, arising from the sale of land of the estateof said William Rathbone, dee'd for partition among the heir at Law of the said William Rathbone, dead, sold by WL Norwood, Commissioner in a special proceeding entitled, Jesse Rathbone, Anson Williamson and others against Thomas Cook and othersin the Superior Court of said Couty before the clerk. This the 22nd day of Jan AD 1891. Susan Williamson (her mark) Witness WC Bennett WM Bennett Then on the same day: the sum of $85.22 in full of that part or share of the estate of WilliamRathbone dec'd, due and going to Susan Williamson sister of said William Rathbone, dec'd, arising from the sale of land of the estate of the said William Rathbone, sold for partition among the heirs at law of the said Wm Rathbone by WL Norwood... in a special proceeding entitled Jesse Rathbone, Susan Williamson and others against Thomas Cook and others ... ; the said sum being one ninth part of the money arising from said sale after deducting the costs and expenses of said sale. Thismoney is paid to the undersigned Geo W. Williamson by order from the said Susan Williamson, sister of the said Wm Rathbone dec'd. In the Petition to sell the land of William Rathbone, ded'd: Filed April 20, 1888 Plaintiffs: Crayton Rathbone,Daniel Rathbone, Joseph Rathbone, Jesse Rathbone, Pernal Rathbone, Avaline Rathbone, N4anson Rathbone, Susan Williamson, PoHy Ann Rains, Laura Price, Reubm Beasley, Green('?) Beasley, Efla Beasley, James Cook, Elizabeth Cook against Thomas Cook,Joseph Cook, Alonzo Beasley, Sally Fish, Miley Fish, Elbert Fish, Isaac Fish, Hester Ruff, Laura Bishop, George Bishop, Safroney Plemmons, John Plenmions and Mira Price. Defendants The petition of the above named plaintiffs showeth mto the court I- That the plaintiffs and the defendants are tenants in common and in possession of the following tract of land, in Haywood county to wit: the farm on which William Rathbone lived at the time of his death, and which he then owned situated onMartin's Creek adjo4iing the lands of Washington Bennet, Speight Clark, the lines of Wm Williamson, and Hardy Noland containing about I 00 acres. 11 - That owing to the smallness of said tract, and the great number of the said tenants in common,the said tract of land can not be divided among the owners, without making the share of each so small that it would be comparatively worthless. III - That all of the defendants are infants, and, as plaintiffs are informed and without guardians. IV- That plaintiffs are unable to state at this time the quantity of interest of each of the parties to this proceeding, some of them having a much larger share in the said land than others V - That a sale of the said land for partition is necessaryin order that the said owners may have and enjoy their various interests therein. Therefore your petitioners pray that the said land may be sold under the decree of this court, upon such terms as to the court shall seem best for the interest ofall the parties. WL Norwood Atty for Petitioners The division is: Daniel Rathbone - 1/9 Joseph Rathbone - 1/9 Susan Williamson - 1/9 Jesse Rathbone - 1/9 Avaline Rathbone - 1/9 Pernal Rathbone - 1/9 J.M. Rathbone - 1/9 R '7- Crayton Rathbone a sonof Westley Rathbone dee'd 1/4of 1/9 = 1/36 Miley Fish, Sally Fish, Elbert Fish, Isaac Fish, the heirs of Elizabeth Fish, a daughter of Westley Rathbone are entitled to 1/4of 1/4of 1/9 each= 1/1 44 PoRy Ann Raines, a daughter of Westley Rathbonedead 1/36 Laura Bishop and husband, M. Sophronia Plemmons and husband, and M. Mira Price, heirs of Silas Rathbone a son of said Westley = 1/3 of 1/4of 1/9 each = I/ 1 08 That the descendants of Patsy Beasley dec'd are as follows, entitled asfollows Reubin Beasley, Green Beasley, Ella Beasley, Alonzo Beasley 4 x 1/54 (1/6 of 1/9 each) [then it says only son of Wm Beasley, decd] James, Elizabeth, Thomas and Joseph Cook 1/4of 1/6 of 1/9 each making each 1/216 M. Hester Ruff, daughter ofStacy Ruff JM Rathbone June 30, 1888 A calculation sheet states: Heirs I - Daniel Rathbone 2 - Joseph Rathbone 3 - Susan Williamson 4- Jesse Rathbone 5- Aveline Rathbone 6- Purnell Rathbone 7- JM Rathbone 8- Wesley Rathbone dee'd a. CraytonRathbone b. Elizabeth Rathbone Fish's 4 children - Miley, Sallie, Elbert, Isaac c. PoHy Ann Rathbone Raines d. Silas Rathbone heirs: Laura Rathbone Bishop, wife of Geo W. Bishop; Sophronia Rathbone Plemmons wife of John Plenumns; Mira RathbonePrice widow of Creasman Price dec'd 9- Patsey Rathbone Beasley dec'd a. Reuben Beasley b. Green Beasley c. Ella Beasley d. Alonzo Beasley, only son of Wm Beasley e. Hester Ruff, only daughter of Stacy Ruff f Caroline Cook's 4 children:James W. Cook, Elizabeth Cook, Thomas Cook, and Joseph Cook Geo W. Williamson plaintiff vs WC Hill adm of Wm Rathbone dee'd is defendant: The subpoena ULsts: SG Brown, Nancy Brown, Thomas Jarrett, AS Clark, Jane Clark, SM Redmond, Thomas Russell,DM Russell, Hiram Rogers, Reuben Justice, Wm H. Brown, Purnell Rathbone, JM Rathbone, Daniel Rathbone, Ella Beasely, Jane Murray wife of James Murray served Sept 7, 1888 The plaintiff complaining of the defendant I- That Wm Rathbone late ofthe county of Haywood died in said county on or about the 10 of April 1887 inte"e and that WC Hill of said county has qualified as administrator of the said William Rathbone U- That plaintiff has furnished board, food lodging and washing andhas cared for the said Wm Rathbone from the month of Oct 1880 to the month of April 1887 the time of his death which said board food lodging washing and care is reasonably(?) worth the sum of one hundred dollars per year making in all the sum ofsix hundred and fifty dollars IH- That the six hundred and fifty dollars has not been paid to him nor any part thereof but remains justly ? to and due to the said plaintiff IV- That the said plaintiff has requested payment of the saidsum of six hundred and fifty dollars so due and ? to him of the said WC Hill administrator of the said Wm Rathbone but he has refiised and neglected and doth still reftise and neglect to pay said sum. Wherefore the plaintiff demands paymentagainst the defendant as administrator ot the said Wm Rathbone I- For the sum of six hundred and fitay dollars with interest thereon from the IO"' day of April 1887 II- For such other and further relief as the plaintiff may be entitledand- to the court shall ? meet and right Ell- For costs of this action Filed May 14, 1888 Superior Court Haywood Co.- George W Williamson being duly sworn says he is a poor person and is unable to give security or makethe deposit required by law to enable him to bring his action against WC Hill admin. Of Wm Rathbone affiant further swears he has as he is informed and believes and is advised by his counsel JCL ? esq a good and meritorious cause of action againstthe said WC Hill as admin of the said Wm Rathbone Max:ch 17,1888 JL Fish sworn says he is well acquainted with the claim of George W Williamson against the estate of Wm Rathbone and ? believes he has a just and meritorious cause of action againstthe estate of said Rathbone. Upon the foregoing affidavits it is ordered that George W Williamson have ? to bring his action against WC Hill admin of Wm Rathbone in founm(?) pauperis(?) and that no officer shall require of him fees for theservices of process. Mar 17,1888 This cause coming on to be heard upon the pleadings and the verdict of the jury and the jury having found ( ) the ( ) submitted to them that there is due to the plaintiff the sum of one hundred and fifty dollarswith interest the sanw from Sept 1" 1887. It is considered by the court that the plaintiff now and of the defendant WC Hill admin of Wm Rathbone the sum of one hundred and sixty four and 50/1 00 dollars (I 64.50) ofwhich%iimonehundredandfiftydoRarsis( )moneyandbearsinterestfromthelOday of April 1889 till ( ). James H. Merrimon Spring Term 1889 Notice - The plaintiff above named (GW Williamson) will take notice that on the 19,h day of March 1889at the residence of JH Noland on Fines Creek Haywood County, before Henry Kingsman Esq, Commissioner appointed by this court ( ) defendant (WC Hill) will proceed to take the depositions of Margaret Lusk, Thomas Russell, and Nancy Brown, to be readin evidence on the trial of the above entitled cause, in the Superior Court of Haywood Co. At which time and place the plaintiff can attend and crossexamine the witnesses if he shall think proper. Mar 14, 1889 WC Hill Defendant Margaret Luskdeposes and says I have been over evry once and a while to see him and he said he put in his supplies and could not get it cooked/cashed (?) to suit him and if he did not do better he GW Williamson plan would have to put him a way if he did not dobetter or make some other arrangements That was the old n-mn Wm Rathbone that told me that. I do not know of my own knowledge whether he fin-nished his supplies or not but he showed me a hog on one occasion and asked me if I did not think it woulddo for his fast/part (?) I am a sister to the wife of Wm Rathbone deceased. Wm Rathbone used his own furniture and bedding and I know he made use of that do not know whether he used his own fimiiture or not but know he had it their. I heard WmRathbone say his things was badly abused and he could not stand it he would have to do some other way. Margaret Lusk (her seal) Thomas Russell deposes and says I lived about one and half miles from Wm Rathbone from 1880 until April 1887. Past veryoften and stopped and stayed frequently, In passing their I saw Wm Rathbone shelling com out of his own crib and taking it to the n3ill and after/often seen him Wm Rathbone taking wheat to the mill and cleaned it to be his own wheat and seen himhalling:flour back and claimed it as his own. This wheat and com was a produce of his own farm and more than enough to support him. I sow this mining from year to year during the hole time spoken of Mr. Rathbone told me at different times that hefurnished enough for himself and his comers and goers and more than enough. I saw him Wm Rathbone on one occasion carrying home sixteen lbs of coffee which he said was for his use and for his comers and goers he told me I lay in for myself and formy comers and goers he told me that different times. Mr. Wm Rathbone told me that Mrs. Williamson was using his household and furniture and was abusing it. I know that Mr. Rathbones household was furnished with bedding and such as cooking vesselschars (?) I know that the plaintiff Williamson used horses oxen wagon and farming tools for mining farming and getting wood Williamson payed Rathbone rent from his fia-m I know that he often cut and carry in wood that is. Rathbone. Cross examined- He says that he sold com at times and claimed that he Wm Rathbone ftu-nished his own and more too. Do not know that he put in enough but he told me he did and more at different times. He told me they badly abused his cook and milk vessels. Didnot hear him say Geo payed his rents. Thomas Russell (his mark) Nancy Brown deposes and swears I have been living in a mile of Wm Rathbone about twenty seven or eight years. I have passed their a heap of times and he always made alittle crop himself both of wheat and com. He always rented out part of his farm and always got in rents and he was a man that always had plenty. I do not know of my own knowledge that he furnished his own supplies but I noticed in passing that healways had plenty and he told me he ftu-nished his own supplies. That was Wm Rathbone himself. I asked Wm Rathbone if he would sell me some flour and he told me he did not know but when he got it home from the mill if he had any to spare he wouldlet me have it but wanted to keep enough for his own use. I sent to Wm Rathbone one spring to buy some lard and he told me that they put it with George Williamson that they all eat together and he had none to spare on the summer before Wm Rathbonedied I was talking to him about coffee being so high and said we would have to quit buying he said he expected to buy as long as he lived that he always layed in enough to do him and more too. AN of these thm32s happened while Mrs. Williamson wasliving with Mr Wm Rathbone. I know that he f@attened his boys three or four of the furst years and that he bought his baco after that. Cross exam - He had several horses but always fed them with his own feed. I do not know that he put in what donehim of my own knowledge. Nancy Brown (her mark) The defendandt(WC Hill) answering the complaint of plaintiff alleges: I - That the first allegation is true H - That the second allegation of said complaint is not true M - That the thirdallegation is not true IV - That during the whole time for which the plaintiff makes his charge, the defendants intestate lodged himself in his own house, furnished his own food, and washing, and cared for himself and plaintiff used the horses,oxen, wagons, tools, and other property of said intestate without charge and plaintiff and his fim3ily lived in intestate house with intestate and subsisted in a great measure upon the provisions furnished by said intestate V- That said intestatein the way of Punishing house, horses, oxen, wagons, tools, household and kitchen ftuniture, provisions etc, did more than compensate the plaintiff for any little services rendered by pl-iintiff, although this defendant protests that no suchservices were rendered. VI That more than three years have elapsed since the time of the alleged boarding, lodging, washing, and caring for defendants intestate, previous to the commencement of this suit, and the plaintiffs said claim is barred bythe statute of limitations. Therefore defendant demands judgment that plaintiff take nothing by his suit and for costs. GS Ferguson WL Norwood, attys for defendant fi DONT KNOW IF THIS IS CORRECT OR NOT FOUND ON INTERNET NAME LISTED AS PURNELLWRATHBONE
|
