|
a.
|
Note: <b>CENSUS DATA</b>
<i><font size=-1>There is no "George Donnel[l]" listed in 1820 Bond Co. There is a George Donald, though, pg 9 line 32. It may or not be the same person. FWM 0-9=2, 16-25=1; FWF 16-25=1. The age group for the wife would be correct, and for the 2 sons. But the older male, HOH, is apparently at least 2 yrs too young. The correct George would have been in the 26-44 age group. Much better is the following:</font></i>
<b>1820, North Carolina, Guilford Co</b> pg 73 line 5:
George Donnel, HOH. FWM: 0-9=4, 26-44=1; FWF 0-9=1, 26-44=1; 1 person engaged in agriculture. <font size=-1>[The next line is John Donnel, same age groups # of people. Possibly a brother of George. And on page 75 are several other Donnel's, including another George, in the 45+ age group. Possibly "our" George's father.]</font>
<b>1830, Illinois, Bond Co</b> pg 219, line 13
George Donnell, HOH. FWM: 0-4=2, 5-9=2, 10-14=2, 30-39=1; FWF: 0-4=1, 30-39=1
<i><font size=-1>there are 2 George Donnell's listed in 1830 Bond Co. Both are males, age 30-39, with wives 30-39. So either could be the same George, based on that. One is on pg 219, line 13; the other on pg 223 line 10. The former is probably the correct one, however, as it shows son in both 0-4 & 5-9 age range, which corresponds to the two oldest living at home in 1850. The latter has children, but no son in the 5-9 age group.</font></i>
2
<b>13 Aug,1850, Illinois, Bond Co</b> pg 361b family #1 lines 1-7:
1] George Donnel, age 57, sex M, occ. Farmer, owns $2600 Real Estate, born North Carolina
2] Ann ", 53, F, North Carolina
3] James M ", 27, M, School Teacher, $400, Illinois
4] Thomas G ", 22, M, Farmer, Illinois
5] George W ", 20, M, Farmer, Illinois
6] Henry C ", 11, M, Illinois, attended school within past year
7] Emily M ", 7, F, Illinois, sch
The IRAD databases [ http://cyberdriveillinois.com/departments/archives/genealogy/landsrch.html ] show many purchases of parcels of land in Bond Co between 1819-1838 by George Donnel and George Donnell.
|
