|
a.
|
Note: John McAneeny in the early Rochester, NY directories seems to match the John McAneeny who shows up in Utica, Oneida County NY in 1855. I think there is a strong possibility that he is another son of David McAneeny and Rose Lavery, possibly their first child. His naturalization states that he was born in County Armagh. I believe that any Co. Armagh McAnaney/McAneenys are related to our line. Evidence for him to be a son of David and Rosanna is that in the 1860 census he has two children, a daughter named Rosanna and a son named David. These names are uncommon in Northern Ireland and coupled with an uncommon surname, I think we have a family member here. I[McAneeny.gedcom.FTW] John McAneeny in the early Rochester, NY directories seems to match the John McAneeny who shows up in Utica, Oneida County NY in 1855. I think there is a strong possibility that he is another son of David McAneeny and Rose Lavery, possibly their first child. His naturalization states that he was born in County Armagh. I believe that any Co. Armagh McAnaney/McAneenys are related to our line. Evidence for him to be a son of David and Rosanna is that in the 1860 census he has two children, a daughter named Rosanna and a son named David! These names are uncommon in Northern Ireland and coupled with an uncommon surname, I think we have a family member here. I[McAneeny.FTW] John McAneeny in the early Rochester, NY directories seems to match the John McAneeny who shows up in Utica, Oneida County NY in 1855. I think there is a strong possibility that he is another son of David McAneeny and Rose Lavery, possibly their first child. His naturalization states that he was born in County Armagh. I believe that any Co. Armagh McAnaney/McAneenys are related to our line. Evidence for him to be a son of David and Rosanna is that in the 1860 census he has two children, a daughter named Rosanna and a son named David! These names are uncommon in Northern Ireland and coupled with an uncommon surname, I think we have a family member here. I
|