|
a.
|
Note: H351
Note: The Hallock Genealogy includes kids NOT IN THE WILL of Willliam II, d 1736, written 1728, (Peter > William I > William II), which might be explained by deaths before 1728, but the Hallock Genealogy indicates otherwise for at least one: Joshua (d 1766 per Hallock genealogy) William, Jr. Frances, md Griffin Kids in the will, NOT IN THE HALLOCK GENEALOGY, include: Abigail, Margaret (altho Margaret might be another name for Mehitable), Jerusha, Mehitabel. Note that in one place Margaret is mentioned, but in list of "my daughters", there is a Mehitable, but no Margaret - this may be a transcription error - but what.. left Margaret out of list of daughters? Transcribed Margaret once and Mehitable a second time for the same person?? ) Kids mentioned in BOTH the will and the Hallock Genealogy, include: Peter, Zebulon, Mary, Prudence. For the moment, I am adding the ones in the will, not the Genealogy to my database. The ones in the Genealogy, not in the will, I'm going to show as died before 1728, except for Joshua. That leaves one kid, Joshua, in the genealogy, not the will, with descendants, who lived to 1766. Anyone know how the authors came to believe he belonged to this William if not in the will? Anyone know why the disparities?? If anyone wants a copy of a transcription of this will, send me an E-Mail. Norris Taylor nmt1@ix.netcom.com ______________ http://www.coastwebis.com/hgo/books/legal1.htm#plum 9. and William Junior, born about 1667, and the progenitor of the lineage of which we will attempt to collate in this manuscript... William Junior, who was evidently the youngest son, and was born about 1667, also is recorded in the Southold Town Records in abstracts and other articles of interest: "{Abstract.} "To all Christian people to whome these presents shall come, Henry Case of Southold weaver, sendeth Greeting. Know Yee that I Henry Case doe, by these presents, in consideration of six pounds, grant bargaine and sell unto William Halliock of Southold, husbandman seven acres or thereabouts, as it was laid out to a first lott scituate within the Township of Southold, bounded on ye East by William Halliock West by Thomas Reve Junr South by ye highway and North so fare as ye division of lotts doth extend. To ye confirmation of ye same I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 11th day of August 1704. Witnesses, HENRY CASE {seale} STEPHEN BAYLEY MARY BAYLEY Acknowleged ye 26th Septr 1705, before me, THOMAS MAPES, Justice" _________________ "{Abstract.} "To all Christian people. Know Yee, that I, John Tooker of Southold, yeoman, in consideration of the sum of twenty four pounds to me in hand paid by William Halliock of Southold, yeoman, doe by these presents give, grant and sell unto ye said William Halliock one certaine tract or percell of land situate on the North side of the Town of Southold by estimation fourteen acres, bounded East by sd William Halliock South by ye highwaye West by Joseph Paine and Northerly by the beach: Also one other tract or percell of land situate at ye rear of ye home lott of Jacob Corye by estimation fifteen acres, bounded Westerly by Peter Dickeson Northerly by William Halliock, and Easterly and Southerly by ye land of Jacob Corye. Witness my hand and seal this 25th day of February 1711-12. Witnesses, MATTHIAS HUCHINSON JOHN TOOKER {seal} WILLIAM BRADLEY Acknowledged 25 Feby. 1711/12, before me, SAMUEL HUCHINSON, Justice. Entd 24th Feby 1718/19, pr Benj: Youngs Town Cler." And in the following, which was found in the account of moneys paid for the destruction of "vermine" during the years 1718 and 1719. The information has little value, save from a human interest point. Note that "do" as used below was at that time evidently a female rabbit, considered to be "vermine": "April 9 (1719) Willm Halliock, 4 young do . . . . 0.09.0" ________________ http://www.coastwebis.com/hgo/books/legal1.htm#plum The above being an abstract leaves much to be desired . . . as there is some confusion even as to the names of the daughters . . . William Junior claims "five daughters", and in the above abstract there is listed six names of daughters, unless Mehitabel and Margaret are one in the same, and one of the youngest. Also, according to Charles Hallock (1906) there was a third son, Joshua, born about 1690, and evidently the eldest of the sons. Joshua "settled in Hallocks Neck, now Old Neck in Moriches." . . . "William Hallock, who was 80 years old in 1866, and who lived near Moriches with his father Jonathan, son of Zebulon, states that his father always spoke of David, son of Joshua, as his first cousin, and of their father Zebulon and Joshua as brothers, and sons of William of Southold, (William Junior), and that Peter had no children." "Of many unexpected coincidences confirming facts in the ancestry, a singular one corroborates the evidence that Joshua Hallock of Moriches was the son of William (Junior)." Quoting the same William Hallock above, Charles Hallock goes on to say, "grandfather, Zebulon, and this Joshua were brothers, and relates that their father, William of Southold, (unhappily) had possession of two very smart colored men, Jack and Brister; that he gave Jack to his son Zebulon, and Brister to his son Joshua in Moriches, with striking anecdotes of Bristers energy and kindness well known in Moriches. This Joshua moved to Orange county, N.Y., near Chester church, of which his son Jonathan was a founder and an officer. In the records of that church were found Lewis Hallock and two female Hallocks, "colored," doubtless the children of this same Brister." But why no mention of Joshua in the 1698 census? Was he dis-inherited in his fathers will, as there is no mention of him in the above abstract? And, William's will clearly gives his slaves to Zebulon and PETER, not Joshua. No record is found of William (3d), son of William Junior, and named in the census of 1698. And since he is not named in the will either, may we presume that he died young, or perhaps he, like his brother Joshua, may be presumed disinherited? No he was most likely the one died 1717. ______________ eter (IA), William: WILLIAM HALLOCK JUNIOR, (son of) William, (grandson of) Peter. William was the son of William and Margaret (Howell) Hallock, and born about 1667, probably in Aqubogue. About 1668 he married Mary ( ), of whom no other record has been found. William Hallock died in the spring of 1736, leaving a will dated 8 June 1728, in which he left his estate to his children below. William and Mary Hallock resided in or near Southold, on lands that were given him by his fathers will in 1684. He also owned lands in Brookhaven Town, Long Island, and probably lived there prior to his fathers death. Their children were: 1. Joshua, born about 1690; 2. Peter, born about 1692; 3. Jerusha; 4. Prudence -Griffin, born about 1693; 5. Mary; 6. Mehitabel, (or Margaret); 7. Abigail; 8. Zebulon, born about 1694; (see below:) 9. William Junior, (3rd), born about 1696. Zebulon Hallock, son of William Junior, is mentioned at least briefly, in the Southold Town Records also, as is his son, Zebulon Junior. Note that the spellings of the surname are gradually becoming more consistent with the present-day spelling: {Abstract.} "To all Christian people Greeting, Know Ye, that I, Zebulon Hallock of Southold, weaver, in consideration of the Sum of ten pounds five Shillings, do sell and confirm unto John Colefax, of New London, cordwaner three lotts of land lying in Hallocks Neck division, bounded west by the land of Samuell Griffing North by the highway east by the sd Samuell Griffing South by the beach or harbor. In Witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 24th day of November 1747. Witnesses. Wm SALMON ZEBULON HALLOCK {seal} ZEBULON HALLIOCK JUN Acknowledged the day and year above written before me ELIJAH HUCHINSON, Justice Entrd Pr Robert Hempsted Town Clerk. Apl 24, 1749" _______________- Per Carol Slotnick: She has Mary Horton for wife: "Page citations should have been 63/65. This is from the Cleves genealogy. John Cleause Jr., on Oct 10, 1717 married Mary (1697 - 1785) Hallock, d/o William and Mary (Horton) Hallock. This does not mention how Mary Horton fits into the Horton tree. If you find out, please let me know."
|
