|
a.
|
Note: 1820: 0-9 10-15 16-18 16-25 26-44 45+ 0-9 10-15 16-25 26-44 45+ forn ag mfct comm 0-14 15-25 26-44 45+
1820 Bath, Morgan Co, VA, p15: 011101-21100 5200 1011 (2 sons 4 dtrs)
1820 White Co p350: 410010-12210 0001 (Barnett b. 1776- 1794)
1830 Jackson Co. p141: 002210010001-01001000101 (so a 50+ and a 90+ male, 60+ and 80+ female -- must have been Mary's parents)
1840 census of Jackson Co, TN lists him in manufacture and trades. Jackson Co, Dist 14, p307: 000000001-0
1820: 5 sons, 5 dtrs 1830: 5 sons 2 dtrs
ERNEST E SHANKS Microfilm:
4118 WEISTER ROAD Submission: AF97122366
LORAIN OH
USA 44053-1522
Supposedly left Va. in the late 1700's and lived in Logan Co. before moving to White Co., TN.
From "j. mcbride" <joan@@hpnc.com> 1/27/99:
A Barnet Gresham was in Ogle Co, GA in 1800 (and as late as 1810), as was Jesse Lee. (Possible source of name "Barnett")
A LWT for a John Grisham in Ogle Co 8 June l827 pr 9 Mar l827 Bk.Cp24 names
wife Susan C and son Joel B.Grisham. Friends Joel and Chas.Barnett exec.
A Barnett Lee was in the 1832 Mason Co, KY probate records.
White County, TN May 11, 1812:
P. 120
Thomas Meek )
To Issd. ) Transfer of Platt and Cert. 64
Barnett Lee ) acres.-
The due execution of the above transfer of platt and certificate was this day acknowledged in open Court by Thomas Meek for the purpose there in Mentioned and ordered to be recorded.-
8/10/1812:
Zachariah Sullins )
vs. ) Debt.
Barrett Lee )
On Motion of the plaintiff by his attorney Howel G. Harris Esq. a Judicial attachment is awarded against his estate of the Defendant returnable here to the Next term of this Court and it is ordered accordingly.-
1/19/1820:
Barnett Lee ) Motion
Vs )
William Thacker) Where as here to fore William H. Haley recovered a Judgement against the defendant and Barnett Lea his Security and it appearing to the Satisfaction of the Court that the plaintiff hath paid the sum of Ten dollars and seventy five cents on said Judgement as security for the defendant. Therefore on motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, William H. Campbell Esqr. It is considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover against the defendant the sum of Ten dollars and seventy five cents the sum paid as a fore said, togeather with his cost by him about his motion in this behalf expended.
10/20/1819:
Isaac Stone )
Vs )_ Debt Cer
Barnett Lee )
On Motion of the plaintiff by his attorney a rule is admitted to shew cause why the Certior air in the cause shall not be dismissed.
1/19/1820:
P. 129 State )
Vs ) Indictment for B.
Thomas Crawley ) Catherine McCollough Prosecutor
This day came the Solicitor General as well as the defendant into open Court in proper person and the defendant being arraigned and charged upon the bill of Indictment pleaded not Guilty there to and for his trial put himself upon the County. Where upon came a Jury of Good and lawful men towit. Fountain Rodgers, James Moore, Elijah Lewis, James Roberts, John Mooneyham, Edward Carroll, Roswell Pool, Barnett Lee, James Isham, James Townsend, Jess Conway, and John McGuire, who being elected tried and sworn the truth the Speak upon the premises. Upon their oath do say, that the defendant is not Guilty in manner and form as charged in the bill of Indictment as in pleading he hath alledged. It is there fore considered by the Court that the defendant from the allegation in said sill of Indictment be acquitted and forever discharged, and that the County of White pay the cost of this prosecution and that certificate issue to the County trustee for the same.
10/9/1820:
By mutual consent of Barnett Lee, and Elizabeth Shoemack, it is ordered by Court that the said Barnett Lee who heretofore had taken John Shoemack, an orphan child, to serve him as an apprentice, be released from the obligations contained in the indenture of said Apprentice, and that he from his said undertaking forever released and that said indenture to all intents and purposes be canselled and become null and void; and it is ordered accordingly.
1/19/1821:
Isaac Stine )
vs Issd. ) Debt Cer.
Barnett Lee )
This day came the parties by their Attornies and thereupon the matters arising out of the rule to shew cause why the Certiorari in the above cause should not be dismissed being solemnly argued it seems to the Court that the law is for the plaintiff. - Therefore on motion of the plaintiff by his Attorney. it is considered by the Court that the rule be made absolute that the Certiorari be dismissed, and that the plaintiff recover against the defendant and Abraham Conner and Finch Worley his securities the sum of eleven dollars seventy three cents debt, together with is costs by him about his suit in this behalf expended &c.
4/13/1821:
State )
vs ) Peace Warrant
Jacob Bean ) Barnett Lee Prosecutor
On motion of the defendant by his Attorney a rule is admitted to shew cause why the warrant and proceedings in this cause should not be quashed.
State )
vs ) Peace Warrant.
Samuel O'Neale ) Barnett Lee Prosecutor
On motion of the defendant by his Attorney a rule is admitted to shew cause why the warrant and proceedings in this cause should not be quashed.
State )
vs ) Peace Warrant
William Smith ) Barnett Lee Prosecutor.
On motion of the Defendant by his Attorney a rule is admitted to shew cause why the warrant and proceeding in this cause not be quashed.
4/14/1821:
William B. Hailly Assee )
for the use of Lewis Fletcher )
vs ) Debt Appeal
Barnett Lee & Anthony Dibrell )
This day came the parties by their attornies and thereupon came a Jury of good and lawful men Towit: Charles Manning, Waymon Leftwick, John Walker, Thomas G. Bellew, Phillip Croft, Kelly Julian, James Townsend, Samuel Williams, Ephraim E. Ford, Moses Norman, Nicholas W. Eastland, and William J. Bennett, who being elected tried and sworn the truth to speak upon the premises upon their oath do say that the defendant owes unto the plaintiff the sum of twenty five dollars the debt in the warrant mentioned that he hath sustained damages by occasion of the detention thereof to the sum of three dollars besides cost. It is therefore on motion of the plaintiff by his Attorney considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover against the defendant the debt aforesaid, together with the damages aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid assessed together with his costs in this behalf expended &c.
4/16/1821:
William B. Hailly Assee )
for the use of Lewis Fletcher )
vs ) Debt Appeal
Barnett Lee & Anthony Dibrell )
This day came the defendants by their Attorney and prayed for and obtained an appeal to the next Circuit Court for White County and filed his reasons therefore which was ordered to be enrolled and made part of the record in this cause, who thereupon entered into and acknowledged bond conditioned as the law requires.
State )
vs Issd. ) Peace Warrant
Jacob Beam. ) Barnett Lee Prost.
This day came as well the Solicitor as well the defendant, and thereupon the matters of law arising out of the defendants rule to shew cause why this warrant and proceedings had in this cause should not be quashed being solemnly argued, it seems to the Court that the law is for the State - It is therefore considered by the Court that the rule be discharged that the State recover against the defendant all cost in this behalf expended. Whereupon the defendant by his Attorney prays a Writ of Errow in this cause, and to him it is granted provided he enter into bond with approved security for the prosecution of the same, on his failure so to do, before the rise of the Court that a Writ of Scire facias issue for the collection thereof &c.
State )
vs Issd. ) Peace Warrant
William Smith ) Barnett Lee Prosecutor
This day came as well the Solicitor as the Defendant and thereupon the matters of law arising out of the Defendants rule to shew cause why the warrant and proceedings had in this cause should not be quashed being solemnly argued, it seems to the Court that the cause for the State. It is therefore considered by the Court that the rule be discharged that the State recover against the defendant all cost in this behalf expended. Whereupon the defendant by his Attorney prays a Writ of Errow in this cause and to him it is granted provided he enters into bond with approved security for the prosecution of the same or on his failure so to do before the rise of this Court that a Writ of Scire facias issue for the collection thereof &c.
State )
vs Issd. ) Peace Warrant
Samuel O. Neale. ) Barnett Lee Prosecutor
This day came as well the Solicitor as the defendant in his proper person and thereupon the matters of law arising out of the defendants rule to shew cause why the warrant and proceeding had in this cause should not be quashed, being solemnly argued it seems to the Court upon the whole matter that the cause is for the State. It is therefore considered by the Court that the rule be discharged that the State recover against the defendant the cost in this behalf expended. Whereupon the defendant by his Attorney prayed
10/17/1821:
David Mitchell. )
William Gracy, )
and his wife Admrs of )
David H. Maybourne Decd )
vs Issd. ) Debt Appeal
Barnett Lee & William Burdin Senr. )
This day came the parties by their attornies and the Defendants declared that they cannot gainsay the plaintiffs action and thereupon confessed Judgement for the sum of twenty four dollars the debt in the warrant in this cause mentioned, and agree that the plaintiff hath sustained damages by occasion thereof to the sum of one dollar sixty eight cents besides cost. It is therefore on motion of the plaintiff by their Attorney considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover against the defendants, and Hopkins L. Turney and Samuel Driskell their security the sum of twenty four dollars, the debt aforesaid, together with the damages aforesaid agreed upon in manner and form aforesaid, together with their cost by him about their suit in this behalf expended &c. and the exr. of the Judgt. is stayed 3 weeks.
10/19/1821:
William Maron )
vs Issd. ) Debt.
Barnett Lee )
This day came the plaintiff by his Attorney, and the defendant having heretofore been summoned as guarnishee to declare how much stood indebted to a certain Frederick Bell against whom the plaintiff hath heretofore removed a Judgement in this Court
1/26/1822:
John H. Marable )
vs. Issd. ) Debt on Scifas.
Barnett Lee & )
Thomas Taylor )
This day came the plaintiff by his Attorney and the Sheriff of White County returned the second Writ of Scirefacias in this cause that the defendant was not found. And the defendants altho again solemnly called to appear and plead to and defend the above cause came not but made default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover against the defendant the sum of one hundred and fourteen dollars, the debt in the Scirefacias mentioned agreeably to the tenor and effect of their recognizance therein mentioned together with the further sum of ten dollars and eighty one and a half cents cost therein mentioned with his cost by him expended in suing forth and prosecuting this Writ.
1/26/1822:
Finch Worley & )
Abraham Conner )
vs Issd. ) Debt. Motion.
Barnett Lee )
This day came the plaintiffs by their Attorney A. B. Lane Esq and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs had paid as security for the defendant the sum of twenty nine dolalrs twenty six and a half cents the amount of debt and costs in a Judgement obtained by a certain Isaac Stone against the said defendant when the plaintiffs were security in White County Court. It is therefore on motion of the plaintiff by his Attorney considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover against the defendant the sum of twenty nine dollars and twenty six and a half cents, the debt aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid assessed, together with their cost by them about their suit in this behalf expended &c.
7/20/1822:
Forrester Mercer & )
Moses Norman )
vs. ) Debt Motion.
Nathaniel J. Ross, Constable )
and William M. Bryan, )
Rezia Jarvis, )
Joseph Kerr, Jr. )
Robert E. Lowrey and )
Elijah Lewis his securities )
This day came the parties by their Attornies and thereupon the plaintiff moved the Court for a Judment against the defendant and his securities, for the amount of the following sums of money being for monies due the plaintiffs and collected by said N. J. Ross Constable as alledged by the plaintiffs Towit: John Gist three dollars thirty seven and a half cents, from Wm. Gist seventy five cents, from Roswell Pool sixty two & a half cents, from Saml. O. Neale eight dollars, thirty seven and a half cents, from Cornelious Nicholas six dollars, William Smith ten dollars thirty seven and a half cents, Barnett Lee four dollars sixty eight and three fourth cents, Wm. Ursery six dollars nienty three and three fourth cents, Saml Thomas, thirteen dollars fifty cents, John Worley twenty five cents, Wm. Evans two dollars fifty six and a fourth, Thomas Taylor six dollars six cents, Edwd. Kindley eighty seven and a half cents, Benjamin Davis four dollars twelve and a half cents, Lindsey Brown one dollar ninety three and three fourth cents, Wm. Brown six dollars eighty seven and a half cents, Sayer Simpson one dollar twenty five cents, Elijah Isham one dollar twenty five cents, Zachariah Ursery nine dollars fifty cents, Jno. Hunter twelve and a half cents, Henry Deweese one dollar forty three and three fourth cents, Robt. Campbell one dollar sixty two and a half cents, Jos. Kerr three dollars and twenty five cents, Danl. Richards one dollar, Joshua Morton one dollar six & a fourth cents, Jesse Davis two dollars seventy five cents, Elijah Lewis seven dollars twenty five cents, Jenky Jenkins one dollar twenty five cents, Matthias Baker sixty two and a half cents, Jos Marsh twenty five cents, Obadiah Harlowe fifty cents, John Massa one dollar, George Bray, sixty two and a half cents, James Bray, two dollars twelve and a half cents, Wm. Medkiff twenty five cents, Luke Dishon, fifty cents, Susan Byar one dollar twenty five cents, Absolom Dunagan twenty three dollars fifty cents and Elisha Goff three dollars eighteen and three fourth cents in all
1/22/1823:
William Burden Senr. )
vs. Issd. ) Debt motion.
Barnett Lee )
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney Samuel Turney Esqrs. and it appearing to the satisfaction of the court that the plaintiff has a Security of the Defendant paid the sum of Twenty five dollars Sixty eight cents debt, and Six dollars thirty five cents costs, with interest thereon up to the time of payment by force of a Judgement which David Mitchell & William Gracy & his wife amdrs. of David H. Maybourn Decd. recovered against the said Barnett Lee, and the plaintiff as his security, at October term of this court 1821.
A Barnett Lee mentioned as a justice of the peace in Morgan Co, VA (WV) 9/21/1820
http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cgi-bin/docviewer.exe?CISOROOT=/FamHist59&CIS OPTR=19941&CISOSHOW=11287
|
